<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Precision | UMQT</title>
    <link>https://umqt.phys.strath.ac.uk/tag/precision/</link>
      <atom:link href="https://umqt.phys.strath.ac.uk/tag/precision/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Precision</description>
    <generator>Wowchemy (https://wowchemy.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Measurement of micro-g acceleration</title>
      <link>https://umqt.phys.strath.ac.uk/cslat-posts/19-05-22-longexpansion/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://umqt.phys.strath.ac.uk/cslat-posts/19-05-22-longexpansion/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;heading&#34;&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;project-summary&#34;&gt;Project summary&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The sensitivity of atom interferometers is usually limited by the observation time of a free-falling cloud of atoms in Earth`s gravitational field. Considerable efforts are currently made to increase this observation time, e.g. in fountain experiments, drop towers and in space. In this article, we experimentally studied and discussed the use of magnetic levitation for interferometric precision measurements.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We used a Bose-Einstein condensate of cesium atoms with tuneable interaction strength and a Michelson interferometer scheme for the detection of micro-g acceleration. In addition, we demonstrated observation times of 1s, which are comparable to current drop-tower experiments. We also studied the curvature of our force field and observed the effects of a phase-shifting element in the interferometer paths [&lt;a href=&#34;https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/ab1bbd&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;New J. Phys. 21, 053028 (2019)&lt;/a&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;motivation&#34;&gt;Motivation&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Atomic fountain interferometers have demonstrated an staggering measurement precision of order Δg/g~10&lt;sup&gt;−10&lt;/sup&gt;. This project does not aim to compete with atomic fountains, but we were curious to test the limits of out magnetic field control in the lab. Most of the technical work is centered around measuring and controlling current in coils, and determining magnetic field gradients and curvatures. Our take-home message from the project was: magnetic field stabilization with 10&lt;sup&gt;-5&lt;/sup&gt; precision for levitation is moderately easy, a 10&lt;sup&gt;-6&lt;/sup&gt; precision is do-able, and less than 10&lt;sup&gt;−7&lt;/sup&gt; will get really hard and tedious.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;interferometer-scheme&#34;&gt;Interferometer scheme&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We employed a Michelson interferometer scheme that is based on three Kapitza-Dirac pulses with a standing light wave [PRL 56 827 (1986), PRL 75 2633 (1995)]. The pulses change the motional states of the matter waves but leave the internal states of the atoms unchanged. Our pulse sequence and the resulting motion of the matter wave packets are illustrated in the figure below. A first pulse splits the BEC into two wave packets with opposite momenta. The wave packets propagate freely for an evolution time T1 until we apply a second pulse that inverts the direction of the wave packets and changes their momentum again. A third pulse is used after an evolution time T2 to recombine the two wave packets. It is identical to the first pulse and generates three wave packets with momenta p0 = 0, ±p. The acquired phase difference ΔΦ between the wave packets can be determined from the relative population of the recombined wave packets on an absorption image.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;figure&gt;&lt;center&gt;
    &lt;img src=&#34;images/InterferometerSchemeFigure.jpg&#34;
         alt=&#34;Absorption images of 3-pulse Michelson interferometer scheme&#34; width=&#34;75%&#34;/&gt;
    &lt;/center&gt;&lt;figcaption&gt;
            &lt;p&gt;Absorption images of 3-pulse Michelson interferometer scheme&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;/figcaption&gt;
&lt;/figure&gt;

&lt;h2 id=&#34;acceleration-measurement&#34;&gt;Acceleration measurement&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The acquired phase difference ΔΦ between the wave packets increases with hold time for external forces. Large forces make ΔΦ oscillate quickly between 0 an 2pi, while small forces result is slow oscillations. The figure below shows this oscillation of ΔΦ (measured by the relative population of the wave packets) for decreasing forces (a,b,c). We experimentally created the forces be changing our levitation current, and thereby changing the levitation gradient, to ΔI/I_lev of (a) 0.003, (b) 0.001, (c) 0.0003. Subplot (d) shows a comparison of the acceleration measurement with the interferometer scheme (red circles) and by a different measurement approach using the center-of-mass motion of a BEC (blue diamonds).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We determine an upper limit for the acceleration of the atoms of 70(10)x10&lt;sup&gt;−6&lt;/sup&gt;g. To the best of our knowledge, this is the smallest absolute value for an acceleration that is measured directly with ultracold atom interferometry. However, the goal of the project is to evaluate the limits, and the article provides a long discussion of technical reasons that limit the measurement precision.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;figure&gt;&lt;center&gt;
    &lt;img src=&#34;images/InterferometerTest.png&#34;
         alt=&#34;Oscillation of the phase and population difference for various accelerations&#34; width=&#34;75%&#34;/&gt;
    &lt;/center&gt;&lt;figcaption&gt;
            &lt;p&gt;Oscillation of the phase and population difference for various accelerations&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;/figcaption&gt;
&lt;/figure&gt;

&lt;h2 id=&#34;measuring-other-potentials&#34;&gt;Measuring other potentials&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After benchmarking the measurement scheme, we started to play with our setup. The figure below shows a measurement of the phase shift that is created when the BEC propagated through another laser beam. Subplot (a) shows the phase shift for minimized acceleration of the atoms (red circles) and for the addition laser beam in the path of the upper wave packet (blue squares). Subplot (b) illustrates of the path of the wave packets and the additional laser beam during the pulse sequence. Angles and axes are not to scale in the illustration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;figure&gt;&lt;center&gt;
    &lt;img src=&#34;images/AddedBeam.png&#34;
         alt=&#34;Phase shift due to an additional laser beam in the interferometer.&#34; width=&#34;75%&#34;/&gt;
    &lt;/center&gt;&lt;figcaption&gt;
            &lt;p&gt;Phase shift due to an additional laser beam in the interferometer.&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;/figcaption&gt;
&lt;/figure&gt;

&lt;h2 id=&#34;free-vertical-expansion-of-a-bec&#34;&gt;Free vertical expansion of a BEC&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Finally, after having minimized residual acceleration with the interferometric measurement scheme, we tried to maximize the evolution time of the BEC with free vertical expansion. Long observation times of an expanding BEC facilitate a sensitive acceleration measurement approach, too. We demonstrate in the article that magnetic levitation allows us to extend the vertical expansion time of a BEC to 1s, and we evaluate advantages and limitations of this scheme for precision measurements.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Typical expansion times for falling BECs are on the order of tens of milliseconds, often limited by the detection area of the imaging system, by the gravitational acceleration and by the expansion velocity of the gas. Usually, the expansion velocity of a quantum gas is not caused by the temperature of the gas but by repulsive interaction during the initial spreading. The current record for long observation times under milli-g acceleration is 1s [Science 329 1540 (2010)]. The experiment was performed in a drop tower, and ballistic expansion was observed over approximately 500 ms, limited by stray magnetic fields. We demonstrate similar observation and expansion times (figure below) for levitated BECs.  Sub-panel (a) shows averaged absorption images, (b) measures the broadening of the expanding BEC, and (c,d) show vertical density profiles for expansion times of 400ms and 600ms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a clear kink in the density profile in sub-panel (d). We failed to explain this kink properly at the time of writing the article. It is caused by a position dependent interaction strength due to our levitation gradient. This observation lead to another project and to another article [&lt;a href=&#34;https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.183602&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 183602 (2020)&lt;/a&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;figure&gt;&lt;center&gt;
    &lt;img src=&#34;images/LongExpansion.png&#34;
         alt=&#34;Long vertical expansion of a BEC&#34; width=&#34;70%&#34;/&gt;
    &lt;/center&gt;&lt;figcaption&gt;
            &lt;p&gt;Long vertical expansion of a BEC&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;/figcaption&gt;
&lt;/figure&gt;</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Experimental setup</title>
      <link>https://umqt.phys.strath.ac.uk/cslat-posts/19-02-01-experimental-setup/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://umqt.phys.strath.ac.uk/cslat-posts/19-02-01-experimental-setup/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The setup is designed to cool a gas of cesium atoms from room temperature to quantum degeneracy. We use a combination of laser cooling techniques, such as 2D and 3D magneto-optical traps (MOTs), degenerate Raman-sideband-cooling, and large dipole traps with laser beam powers up to 200W. The final cooling step is based on evaporative cooling in a crossed-beam dipole trap. We reach Bose-Einstein-condensates (BECs) of 300,000 atoms in 12s.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;vacuum-apparatus&#34;&gt;Vacuum apparatus&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We tried to keep the vacuum apparatus as simple as possible. There are two glass cells, one with a moderate pressure of 10&lt;sup&gt;-8&lt;/sup&gt; mbar for the 2D MOT and one with 10&lt;sup&gt;-11&lt;/sup&gt; mbar for the 3D MOT and the main experiments. All pumps, gauges, vales, and ampules with cesium, are in the middle. The atoms diffuse from the cesium ampule into the glass cess of the 2D MOT. They are cooled with laser beams along two directions, and finally pushed with another laser beam into the main glass cell.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;figure&gt;&lt;center&gt;
    &lt;img src=&#34;images/VacuumJoined.jpg&#34; width=&#34;60%&#34;/&gt;
    &lt;/center&gt;&lt;figcaption&gt;
            &lt;h4&gt;Vaccuum system with two glass cells&lt;/h4&gt;
        &lt;/figcaption&gt;
&lt;/figure&gt;

&lt;h2 id=&#34;bose-einstein-condensate&#34;&gt;Bose-Einstein condensate&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The final cooling step is based on evaporative cooling in a crossed-beam dipole trap. Once a critical temperature Tc is reached, the gas shows a phase transition towards a Bose-Einstein-condensates. We create BECs of 300,000 atoms in a total duration of 12s.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The figure below shows absorption images of the momentum profile of a gas of atoms. Left, top to bottoms: The profile changes as the gas is cooled below the critical temperature. Below Tc, a BEC forms and the gas is localized in momentum space. Right: Horizontally integrated density profiles in momentum space. Again, you momentum profiles narrows below the critical temperature.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;figure&gt;&lt;center&gt;
    &lt;img src=&#34;images/BEC.jpg&#34; width=&#34;75%&#34;/&gt;
    &lt;/center&gt;&lt;figcaption&gt;
            &lt;h4&gt;Aborption images and profiles of quantum gas of cesium atoms&lt;/h4&gt;
        &lt;/figcaption&gt;
&lt;/figure&gt;

</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
